Visualizing Carneades Argument Graphs

نویسنده

  • Thomas F. Gordon
چکیده

Carneades is a computational model of argument, based on the state-of-theart of argumentation theory in philosophy. This article presents a diagramming method for Carneades, similar to Wigmore charts, and illustrates how to map legal evidence using this method. With suitable computer support, in the form of a special purpose argument diagram editor, users need not understand the mathematics of the computational model to make use of its features. Compared to a generic diagram editor, or even special purpose argument diagramming tools based only on informal models of argument, an argument diagramming tool based on the Carneades computational model of argument has the advantage of being able to inform users, in an intuitively comprehensible way, whether or not a claim satisfies a proof standard, given the evidence and other arguments which have been put forward by the parties. The presentation is entirely informal. No prior expertise in argumentation theory, mathematics or computer science is presumed.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Interchanging arguments between Carneades and AIF

We have implemented a translator that translates Carneades Argument Graphs as specified in the LKIF files of the Carneades editor to a database specification of the Argument Interchange Format and vice versa. In this paper the algorithms for this translation are presented.

متن کامل

Relating Carneades with abstract argumentation via the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation

Carneades is a recently proposed formalism for structured argumentation with varying proof standards, inspired by legal reasoning but more generally applicable. Its distinctive feature is that each statement can be given its own proof standard, which is claimed to allow a more natural account of reasoning under burden of proof than existing formalisms for structured argumentation, in which proo...

متن کامل

Probabilistic Semantics for the Carneades Argument Model Using Bayesian Networks

This paper presents a technique with which instances of argument structures in the Carneades model can be given a probabilistic semantics by translating them into Bayesian networks. The propagation of argument applicability and statement acceptability can be expressed through conditional probability tables. This translation suggests a way to extend Carneades to improve its utility for decision ...

متن کامل

Combining Rules and Ontologies with Carneades

The Carneades software system provides support for constructing, evaluating and visualizing arguments, using formal representations of facts, concepts, defeasible rules and argumentation schemes. This paper illustrates how rules and ontologies can be combined in Carneades with a prototype legal application for analyzing open source software license compatibility issues in particular cases.

متن کامل

Relating Carneades with Abstract Argumentation

Carneades is a recently proposed formalism for structured argumentation with varying proof standards. An open question is its relation with Dung’s seminal abstract approach to argumentation. In this paper the two formalisms are formally related by translating Carneades into ASPIC, another recently proposed formalism for structured argumentation. Since ASPIC is defined to generate Dungstyle abst...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007